Saturday, November 1, 2008

NCAA: APR's top 30+, Week 10

2008 Navigation Links

Read this for a description of APR.
Read this for some disclaimers about applying APR to NCAA.

BCS Rankings will be added when they are out (and I see them).


RankTeamW-LPower
Index
This week
1 (↑2)Florida
BCS=5
7-11.7649
(LW × 1.072)
won by 39
at Georgia
2 (↓1)Texas
BCS=4
8-11.7174
(LW × 0.977)
lost by 6
at Texas-Tech
3 (↓1)Penn-St
BCS=3
9-01.6993
(LW × 1.005)
Bye
4 (↑1)Texas-Tech
BCS=2
9-01.6573
(LW × 1.018)
won by 6
vs Texas
5 (↑1)Oklahoma
BCS=6
8-11.6546
(LW × 1.023)
won by 34
vs Nebraska
6 (↑2)Alabama
BCS=1
9-01.5917
(LW × 0.999)
won by 35
vs Arkansas-St
7 (↓3)USC
BCS=7
7-11.5662
(LW × 0.954)
won by 56
vs Washington
8 (↑5)Boise-St
BCS=10
8-01.5534
(LW × 1.018)
won by 49
at New-Mexico-St
9 (-)North-Carolina
BCS=19
6-21.5419
(LW × 0.974)
Bye
10 (↓3)Oklahoma-St
BCS=9
8-11.5194
(LW × 0.954)
won by 42
vs Iowa-St
11 (↓1)Georgia
BCS=13
7-21.5103
(LW × 0.957)
lost by 39
vs Florida
12 (-)Ohio-St
BCS=11
7-21.5052
(LW × 0.986)
Bye
13 (↓2)Missouri
BCS=14
7-21.4963
(LW × 0.964)
won by 3
at Baylor
14 (↑32)West-Virginia
BCS=25
6-21.4799
(LW × 1.123)
won by 22
at Connecticut
15 (↓1)Ball-St
BCS=17
8-01.4657
(LW × 0.992)
Bye
16 (↑8)Miami-FL6-31.4649
(LW × 1.044)
won by 7
at Virginia
17 (↑5)TCU
BCS=12
9-11.4605
(LW × 1.019)
won by 30
at UNLV
18 (↓1)Utah
BCS=8
9-01.4605
(LW × 1.006)
won by 3
at New-Mexico
19 (↓3)Michigan-St
BCS=18
8-21.4502
(LW × 0.998)
won by 1
vs Wisconsin
20 (↑9)Mississippi5-41.4263
(LW × 1.037)
won by 10
vs Auburn
21 (↑9)Pittsburgh6-21.4154
(LW × 1.032)
won by 3
at Notre-Dame
22 (↓2)Florida-St
BCS=22
6-21.4130
(LW × 0.975)
lost by 3
at Georgia-Tech
23 (-)Iowa5-41.4019
(LW × 0.988)
lost by 3
at Illinois
24 (↑23)Northwestern
BCS=24
7-21.3946
(LW × 1.059)
won by 7
at Minnesota
25 (↑28)Cincinnati6-21.3864
(LW × 1.071)
won by 14
vs South-Florida
26 (↑12)South-Carolina6-31.3827
(LW × 1.032)
won by 21
vs Tennessee
27 (↓8)Minnesota7-21.3826
(LW × 0.954)
lost by 7
vs Northwestern
28 (↓7)Tulsa8-11.3807
(LW × 0.957)
lost by 7
at Arkansas
29 (↓11)Virginia5-41.3726
(LW × 0.946)
lost by 7
vs Miami-FL
30 (↑6)Rutgers3-51.3714
(LW × 1.018)
Bye
31 (↑10)California
BCS=21
6-21.3681
(LW × 1.026)
won by 10
vs Oregon

Other Notable Teams:
34 (↑3)Georgia-Tech
BCS=20
7-21.3533
(LW × 1.008)
won by 3
vs Florida-St
38 (↑10)BYU
BCS=15
8-11.3463
(LW × 1.024)
won by 3
at Colorado-St
45 (↑7)LSU
BCS=16
6-21.3292
(LW × 1.025)
won by 25
vs Tulane
48 (↑1)Maryland
BCS=23
6-21.3209
(LW × 1.006)
Bye

Comments:

  • These numbers do not include the score of East Carolina @ UCF, which is not played until late Sunday night. Since neither one of them is anywhere near the top 30, this shouldn't be a big deal. It could potentially affect the ordering of teams with very close power index values (e.g. #10 Oklahoma St and #11 Georgia, or #15 Ball St and #16 Miami of Florida).

  • Texas drops on their loss. But they had such a massive lead coming in to this week, even with the loss, the only reason they drop to #2 is because the Gators hit the APR trifecta: (1) a big-margin win (2) on the road (3) against a high-ranked opponent.

  • I suppose Alabama will now be #1 in the BCS poll, but I think I'm with APR on this one—they're good, but the teams above them have more impressive records.

  • Rutgers is 3-2 in their last 5, including a win against Pennsylvania last week (APR gives less weight to their early losses). They might still have a shot at 6 wins (and bowl elegibility). Certainly they'll be happy to play spoiler next week at South Florida.

  • BYU and LSU move up some this week. Both of them probably have at least one more loss coming...

  • USC puts a 56-0 strapping on Washington, and takes a 4.6% hit on their power index for their trouble. That's probably a bug in APR. But even if I think of a satisfactory way to fix it, I'm not going to roll it out before the end of the season.

  • LSU is no longer the lowest-rated BCS-ranked team. Maryland has North Carolina, Florida State, and Boston College to finish out their season, so if they belong ranked, they have their chance to prove it.