Monday, September 20, 2010

NFL: Week 2 Power Rankings

RankTeamPower
Index
W-LThis Week
1 (↑3)Chiefs1.2886
(LW × 1.1318)
2-0Won by 2
@ Browns
2 (↓1)Packers1.2336
(LW × 1.0776)
2-0Won by 27
vs Bills
3 (↑7)Steelers1.2089
(LW × 1.1225)
2-0Won by 8
@ Titans
4 (↑13)Falcons1.1330
(LW × 1.1689)
1-1Won by 34
vs Cardinals
5 (↓3)Texans1.1284
(LW × 0.9910)
2-0Won by 3
@ Redskins
6 (↑16)Chargers1.1149
(LW × 1.3487)
1-1Won by 25
vs Jaguars
7 (-)Dolphins1.0440
(LW × 0.9642)
2-0Won by 4
@ Vikings
8 (↑2)Buccaneers1.0214
(LW × 0.9484)
2-0Won by 13
@ Panthers
9 (↑1)Bears0.9835
(LW × 0.9132)
2-0Won by 7
@ Cowboys
10 (↑14)Colts0.9732
(LW × 1.1845)
1-1Won by 24
vs Giants
11 (↓7)Jaguars0.9693
(LW × 0.8513)
1-1Lost by 25
@ Chargers
12 (↑5)Browns0.9679
(LW × 0.9985)
0-2Lost by 2
vs Chiefs
13 (↓6)Ravens0.9538
(LW × 0.8809)
1-1Lost by 5
@ Bengals
14 (↑12)Jets0.9451
(LW × 1.2001)
1-1Won by 14
vs Patriots
15 (-)Titans0.9396
(LW × 0.8767)
1-1Lost by 8
vs Steelers
16 (↑13)Eagles0.9359
(LW × 1.3935)
1-1Won by 3
@ Lions
17 (↓7)Redskins0.9024
(LW × 0.8379)
1-1Lost by 3
vs Texans
18 (↓1)Lions0.8946
(LW × 0.9230)
0-2Lost by 3
vs Eagles
19 (↓13)Patriots0.8884
(LW × 0.8196)
1-1Lost by 14
@ Jets
20 (↑2)Broncos0.8645
(LW × 1.0458)
1-1Won by 17
vs Seahawks
21 (↓11)Saints0.8487
(LW × 0.7880)
2-0Won by 3
@ 49ers
22 (↓15)Cardinals0.8264
(LW × 0.7631)
1-1Lost by 34
@ Falcons
23 (↑3)Bills0.8197
(LW × 1.0408)
0-2Lost by 27
@ Packers
24 (↓7)Cowboys0.8113
(LW × 0.8370)
0-2Lost by 7
vs Bears
25 (↓22)Giants0.8071
(LW × 0.7088)
1-1Lost by 24
@ Colts
26 (↑4)Bengals0.8067
(LW × 1.2772)
1-1Won by 5
vs Ravens
27 (↓10)Vikings0.7724
(LW × 0.7968)
0-2Lost by 4
vs Dolphins
28 (↓13)Seahawks0.7709
(LW × 0.7193)
1-1Lost by 17
@ Broncos
29 (↑2)Raiders0.7219
(LW × 1.1830)
1-1Won by 2
vs Rams
30 (↓4)Rams0.7053
(LW × 0.8957)
0-2Lost by 2
@ Raiders
31 (↓6)Panthers0.6847
(LW × 0.8384)
0-2Lost by 13
vs Buccaneers
32 (↓1)49ers0.5999
(LW × 0.9831)
0-2Lost by 3
vs Saints

Comments:

  • Chiefs at #1? Well, they are 2-0, which is about all APR sees right now. And helped by the Chargers win today.

  • And the 2-0 Saints drop to #21! Well, close wins over a couple 0-2 opponents doesn't look very good (especially squeaking out a last-second 3-point win on the 49ers, after they got pasted 6-31 last week).

  • And the 0-2 Browns at #12... but they do have close wins against a couple 2-0 opponents. That's how this is supposed to work. But wow, this has been a wacky couple weeks of football.

  • No surprise, all the big movers are 1-1 teams: Giants (22), Chargers (16), Cardinals (14), Seahawks, Falcons, Eagles, Patriots (13).

  • Pick results coming sometime Tuesday, followed by picks for next week.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

NFL: Week 2 Game Picks

All line values are taken from yahoo.com, and are for comparison purposes only.

GameAPRSRSLine
Saints @
49ers
Saints
ρ=1.7648
Saints
δ=30
Saints
-5
Ravens @
Bengals
Ravens
ρ=1.7144
Ravens
δ=15
Ravens
-1½
Bills @
Packers
Packers
ρ=1.4536
Packers
δ=12
Packers
-13½
Eagles @
Lions
Lions
ρ=1.4433
Lions
δ=2
Eagles
-4½
Giants @
Colts
Giants
ρ=1.3858
Giants
δ=23
Colts
-5½
Jaguars @
Chargers
Jaguars
ρ=1.3774
Jaguars
δ=14
Chargers
-8½
Patriots @
Jets
Patriots
ρ=1.3764
Patriots
δ=15
Patriots
-2
Buccaneers @
Panthers
Buccaneers
ρ=1.3187
Buccaneers
δ=16
Panthers
-3
Seahawks @
Broncos
Seahawks
ρ=1.2966
Seahawks
δ=32
Broncos
-3½
Rams @
Raiders
Rams
ρ=1.2905
Rams
δ=21
Raiders
-3½
Chiefs @
Browns
Chiefs
ρ=1.1746
Chiefs
δ=10
Browns
-2
Dolphins @
Vikings
Dolphins
ρ=1.1171
Dolphins
δ=10
Vikings
-5½
Cardinals @
Falcons
Cardinals
ρ=1.1171
Cardinals
δ=10
Falcons
-6½
Bears @
Cowboys
Bears
ρ=1.1111
Bears
δ=11
Cowboys
-8½
Texans @
Redskins
Texans
ρ=1.0572
Texans
δ=4
Texans
-3
Steelers @
Titans
Steelers
ρ=1.0049
Titans
δ=19
Titans
-5

Comments:

  • Picks are based on the Week 1 power rankings.

  • All 1-0 teams are ranked above all 0-1 teams, so there are some... odd picks, like the Dolphins over the Vikings.

  • APR and SRS are agreed on all games except Steelers @ Titans.

  • After the way the 49ers got clobbered on Sunday, I'm really surprised the Saints are only favored by 5.

  • On the other hand, it says something about how bad the Bills looked that even after the Packers lost Ryan Grant, they're still favored by 13½.

NFL: Week 1 Pick Results

Winning teams in bold.

Unanimous Picks (5-3)

Right

Cardinals @ Rams
Raiders @ Titans
Lions @ Bears
Bengals @ Patriots
Packers @ Eagles

Wrong

Colts @ Texans
The Colts won't win many games this year if they can't stop the run. The Texans' Arian Foster had 231 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns against the Colts' alleged run defense.

Cowboys @ Redskins
This game was just a disaster for the Cowboys. Offensive futility, 10 penalties, a fumble lost for a touchdown, and the game winning touchdown called back on a holding call.

Chargers @ Chiefs
Matt Cassel was 10/22, 68 yards, and a touchdown. The Chargers outgained the Chiefs nearly 2-to-1. They win this game easily, except for three disasterous plays: a run that broke 56 yards for a touchdown, a fumble return that set up a short drive for a second touchdown, and a 94-yard punt return for a third. The Chargers managed to drive well within field goal range at the end of the game, so they likely could have escaped with a 3-point win if they could have stopped even one of these plays.

Split (std: 2-6 RH: 5-3 Line: 5-3)

49ers (std, Line) @ Seahawks (RH)
The Seahawks were so awful last season, it's hard to believe they've made dramatic improvements already. But somehow the Seahawks looked like the defensive-minded team ready to contend for the division.

Broncos (std, RH) @ Jaguars (Line)
You've got to put this one on the Broncos defense. Last year, the Broncos (and the Jaguars, for that matter) only made it to 24 points in 6 games.

Dolphins (std, Line) @ Bills (RH)
Last year, the Dolphins struggled on the road, including a 14-31 loss at Buffalo. They probably would've lost again this year, except the Bills' offense managed exactly one drive longer than 27 yards.

Panthers (std) @ Giants (RH, Line)
Matt Moore had an absolutely miserable day as the Panthers' QB: 14/33, 182 yards, 1 TD and 3 interceptions. It's a wonder that they managed 18 points, and actually lead at half time.

Browns (std, RH) @ Bucs (Line)
Jake Delhomme's troubles seem to have followed him to Cleveland: 2 interceptions and a 54% completion rate is going to make it tough to beat anyone.

Falcons (Line) @ Steelers (std, RH)
No QB controversy in Pittsburgh. The defense and running game manage to pull out a win.

Ravens (std) @ Jets (RH, Line)
Maybe the Jets will do better against lesser defenses, but they looked really sloppy in this game. Sanchez had a 41.7% completion rate, and the running game just wasn't there to take up the slack.

Vikings (std) @ Saints (RH, Line)
The Vikings are another team that are in real trouble if their offense can't get going. They only had two drives longer than 34 yards, which is stunning for a sqaud that had 4 drives of 70 yards or more against the Saints defense last year in the Championship Game.

Totals

Pythagorean (std) 79
Pythagorean (R/H)106
Line 106

A nice confirmation of the R/H split idea. This also agrees with runs that I've done on previous seasons, which suggests that the R/H variation averages a couple picks better than the standard version.

Monday, September 13, 2010

NFL: Week 1 Power Rankings

Update: just noticed that the Chargers and Chiefs were missing out of the rankings. Fixed.

This is using a revamped power ranking system, which means that the power values are not comparable to the ones posted in 2008 or 2009. More details later this week.

RankTeamPower
Index
W-LThis Week
1Packers1.14471-0Won by 7
@ Eagles
2Texans1.13861-0Won by 10
vs Colts
3Giants1.13861-0Won by 13
vs Panthers
T 4Jaguars1.13861-0Won by 7
vs Broncos
T 4Chiefs1.13861-0Won by 7
vs Chargers
6Patriots1.08391-0Won by 14
vs Bengals
T 7Cardinals1.08281-0Won by 4
@ Rams
T 7Ravens1.08281-0Won by 1
@ Jets
T 7Dolphins1.08281-0Won by 5
@ Bills
T10Saints1.07701-0Won by 5
vs Vikings
T10Steelers1.07701-0Won by 6
vs Falcons
T10Buccaneers1.07701-0Won by 3
vs Browns
T10Bears1.07701-0Won by 5
vs Lions
T10Redskins1.07701-0Won by 6
vs Cowboys
T15Titans1.07181-0Won by 25
vs Raiders
T15Seahawks1.07181-0Won by 25
vs 49ers
T17Falcons0.96930-1Lost by 6
@ Steelers
T17Browns0.96930-1Lost by 3
@ Buccaneers
T17Lions0.96930-1Lost by 5
@ Bears
T17Vikings0.96930-1Lost by 5
@ Saints
T17Cowboys0.96930-1Lost by 6
@ Redskins
T22Chargers0.82660-1Lost by 7
@ Chiefs
T22Broncos0.82660-1Lost by 7
@ Jaguars
24Colts0.82170-1Lost by 10
@ Texans
25Panthers0.81670-1Lost by 13
@ Giants
T26Jets0.78750-1Lost by 1
vs Ravens
T26Bills0.78750-1Lost by 5
vs Dolphins
T26Rams0.78750-1Lost by 4
vs Cardinals
29Eagles0.67160-1Lost by 7
vs Packers
30Bengals0.63160-1Lost by 14
@ Patriots
T3149ers0.61020-1Lost by 25
@ Seahawks
T31Raiders0.61020-1Lost by 25
@ Titans

Comments:

  • As usual, these ranks are based on a the result of single week's worth of games, so don't read too much into it.

  • Also as usual, all 1-0 teams are ranked above all 0-1 teams, and a number of ties in the rankings.

  • I'm going to try a different style of posting from last year. This year, the power rankings will go up right after the last game of the week goes final (as near as I can manage), with the Pick Results following Tuesday.

Monday, September 6, 2010

NFL Week 1 Picks

Hey, kids—it's time for week 1 picks!

Like last year, week 1 picks will be based on Pythagorean Projection. As usual, picks are sorted by the confidence factor of the left-most column, from highest to lowest.

  • Pythag (std): these picks are based on the standard Pythagorean Projection. The confidence numbers are just the differences of the projection values for each team.

  • Pythag (R/H): these picks are based on a variation of the Pythagorean Projection. Two projections are created for each team, splitting teams based on road games and home games. Here, the road projection of the road team is compared to the home projection of the home team.

  • The untitiled column with the asterisks indicate where the standard and R/H projections differ.

  • Line: as usual, line values are taken from yahoo, and are used for comparison purposes only.


GamePythag
(std)
Pythag
(R/H)
Line
Cardinals @
Rams
Cardinals
(0.4809)
Cardinals
(0.5777)
Cardinals
-4
Chargers @
Chiefs
Chargers
(0.4004)
Chargers
(0.5264)
Chargers
-5
Cowboys @
Redskins
Cowboys
(0.3399)
Cowboys
(0.3062)
Cowboys
-3½
49ers @
Seahawks
49ers
(0.2809)
Seahawks
(0.1561)
*49ers
-3
Raiders @
Titans
Titans
(0.2503)
Titans
(0.4226)
Titans
-6½
Lions @
Bears
Bears
(0.2376)
Bears
(0.5137)
Bears
-6
Bengals @
Patriots
Patriots
(0.1949)
Patriots
(0.5475)
Patriots
-4
Broncos @
Jaguars
Broncos
(0.1585)
Broncos
(0.0256)
Jaguars
-2½
Packers @
Eagles
Packers
(0.1000)
Packers
(0.0851)
Packers
-3
Dolphins @
Bills
Dolphins
(0.0879)
Bills
(0.1129)
*Dolphins
-3
Colts @
Texans
Colts
(0.0830)
Colts
(0.1400)
Colts
-2½
Panthers @
Giants
Panthers
(0.0490)
Giants
(0.0202)
*Giants
-7
Browns @
Buccaneers
Browns
(0.0306)
Browns
(0.0751)
Buccaneers
-3
Falcons @
Steelers
Steelers
(0.0097)
Steelers
(0.1108)
Falcons
-2½
Ravens @
Jets
Ravens
(0.0076)
Jets
(0.2208)
*Jets
-2½
Vikings @
Saints
Vikings
(0.0034)
Saints
(0.1562)
*Saints
-4½

Comments:

  • I will update with the lines for the two Monday Night games as soon as I see them up. Update: done.

  • The 49ers went just 2-6 on the road last year. One of those 6 losses was at the Seahawks. They may be the favorite to win the NFC West, but this is a game the 49ers need to win if that is to mean anything more than a one-and-done appearance on Wildcard Weekend.

  • Last year, the Vikings faded a bit towards the end of the season, going 0-3 in prime time road games (at least two of which should have been reasonably easy wins).

  • The Saints had their late-season troubles too, finishing 0-3 while the #1 seed was still open. They also didn't really look that good in the NFC Championship Game—the only reason they were in it at the end is because the Vikings kept turning the ball over to them.

Friday, September 3, 2010

NFL: Preseason Points

It's tough to make predictions based on preseason results in the NFL, but I was looking at the stats for total points scored, and saw some interesting results. A more careful analysis would break down points scored based on whether or not the first teams were in, but I'll leave that for someone else.

Points For

RankTeamPF
1Packers123
2Saints122
3Bengals112
4Bills111
⋮⋮⋮
29Jets57
30Falcons55
31Bears46
32Panthers33

Comments

  • The Packers and Saints are right back to their high-scoring ways

  • Perhaps the Bengals' biggest problems last season was an inability to score points. Maybe they've finally got that fixed?

  • It doesn't bode well for teams (like the Jets and Bears) that have high expectations for the season that they scored so few points in the preseason.

  • The Panthers scored just 2 touchdowns in the preseason (every other team scored at least 5). There is some good news for them, though, seen below.

Points Against

RankTeamPA
T1Ravens52
T1Panthers52
3Falcons57
T4Cardinals, Vikings59
⋮⋮⋮
28Broncos106
30Bills111
31Bengals112
32Colts160

Comments

  • Lost in the attention given their QB controversy, the Cardinals had a very good preseason on defense.

  • The Panthers had a very good preseason on defense too. But unless their offense gets going, they will likely still struggle to make it to 8 wins this year.

  • Bad news for the Bengals: getting the offense going isn't going to help if the defense suddenly becomes a revolving door.

  • The Colts defense really got smoked in the preseason (though not all of those 160 points is their fault, the special teams were giving up touchdowns too).

Net Points

RankTeamNet Pts
1Vikings34
2Ravens33
349ers32
4Packers31
⋮⋮⋮
29Seahawks-15
30Panthers-19
31Bears-38
32Colts-70
  • Some of the usual suspects at the top of the list. The Ravens and 49ers have to be the early favorites to win their respective divisions, I think.

  • I posted this a few times elsewhere, but it's worth repeating: if the Bears are mastering a Martz-style offense, they kept it well hidden in the preseason.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

NFL: Pythagorean Projection 2009->2010

Preseason football is just a few weeks away now, so it's time to start getting ramped up for the 2010 season. With that in mind, here are the Pythagorean Projections for the 2010 season.

FYI: Details of how Pythagorean Projection works, 2008->2009 Projections, 2008->2009 Projection vs Reality

TeamProjected
Wins
Comment
Rams 1.6 New QB
Raiders 2.8 New QB
Lions 2.9
Buccaneers 3.8
Browns 4.3 New QB
Chiefs 4.7
Seahawks 5.0 New HC
Jaguars 5.5
Bills 5.8 New QB?
Redskins 5.8 New QB, HC
Bears 6.7 New OC
Titans 6.8
Dolphins 7.2 New QB?
Giants 7.4
Broncos 8.1 QB Issues
Panthers 8.2 New QB
Bengals 8.4
Falcons 9.0
Steelers 9.2 QB Issues
Cardinals 9.3 New QB
Texans 9.4
49ers 9.5
Eagles 10.2 New QB
Colts 10.8
Chargers 11.1
Cowboys 11.3
Jets 11.4 Lots of FA acquisitions
Saints 11.5
Ravens 11.5
Patriots 11.5
Vikings 11.6
Packers 11.8

Comments:

  • The Rams scored the fewest total points (175) in the league last year, and fell 69 points short of the team with 3rd fewest total points (Buccaneers, 244).

    The good news for rookie QB Sam Brafford is all he has to do to beat that is average 11 points per game. The bad news is the Rams also allowed the 2nd most total points (436), surpassed only by the Lions (494).

  • If Ndamukong Suh can be productive for the Lions right away, if Matt Stafford and Calvin Johnson can stay healthy the whole season... I think the Lions have a real shot at 6 or more wins this season, even if nothing else improves.

  • The Bills and Dolphins both had QB problems last season. It would be a major improvement for both teams if they could each get through the whole season with just one guy starting at QB.

  • I think the Bears could be in real trouble. They don't have anything like the offensive players Martz had in St. Louis back in the day (Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, Tory Holt, Isaac Bruce). And with the Lions making some big off-season improvements, and the Packers and Vikings both coming back for more, the Bears could very easily get caught short in what could be one of the most competitive divisions of the 2010 season.

  • Besides their QB issues, the Steelers really need Troy Polomalu to stay healthy for 16 games.

  • Can the Patriots get to 11 or 12 wins? That seems like a lot for a team that only had 2 road wins in 2009.